RISK

NEWS

Failure to create safe working environment could result in jail for employers

15 Jul 2020

Business owners that do not follow government rules to protect staff and customers as the lockdown is eased could find themselves in prison for breaking health and safety laws, the Business Secretary Alok Sharma has said.

Sharma told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:

“There is a legal duty requirement for businesses to keep their workers safe, for those who interact in those businesses to keep them safe. If people are ignoring the rules and they are not keeping a workplace safe, then there are clearly measures that can be followed and it is possible for there to be enforcement notices, there are going to be checks that are carried out, spot checks by the Health and Safety Executive, which they are already doing.

“And in the case where someone is not following an enforcement order and not fixing things in a workplace, then, for the most serious offences, people can go to prison for up to two years. These are real powers and real teeth that are in place.”

The term ‘COVID-secure workplace’ has been used to describe those workplaces that are fit for a safe return to work, but its definition remains unclear, as does the understanding of how workplaces will be regulated during the pandemic.

Says Kate Gardner, health and safety consultant with International Workplace:

“Making a workplace COVID-secure is a shared responsibility for everyone, including building owners, building managers and occupiers. For many within the FM sector, making workplaces safe started with reviewing how many staff worked in the space before the lockdown was implemented and then working out how many staff can now occupy the space and continue to observe social distancing guidelines. Key considerations here are around minimising contact within workstations, breakout areas, meeting rooms and kitchen or canteen spaces.

“While it’s very possible to implement physical changes such as screens, floor markings, one way systems, information signs and increased cleaning regimes, it remains everyone’s responsibility to follow the government guidance – wash hands regularly, don’t touch your face, keep socially distanced and wear a face covering when using public transport or in public spaces where social distancing is not possible.”

Says Dewi Ap-Thomas, partner and head of regulatory at national law firm Weightmans LLP:

“Government guidance requires businesses to do ‘all that is reasonably practicable’ in preparing their workspaces for staff – so anything that can be done, should be done – within reason. The law does not require businesses to close or implement measures that would be financially devastating and compromise the viability of the business itself.”

Kate adds:

“‘Reasonable’ will involve implementing both physical and behavioural controls and includes ensuring that everyone understands why it’s important to follow the various protocols that the ‘new normal’ will introduce. Clear, unambiguous information, consistently applied, will be key to ensuring our workplaces are safe spaces to work. Taking appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure buildings can be used in a safe and secure way is vital. Communication and cooperation between everyone is essential to make sure that the right programme of control measures are implemented at the right time. People may well need to be reminded about the new protocols in workplaces, so we need to be mindful of how we coach people to make these new ways of working automatic habits.”

Adds Ap-Thomas:

“The nature of COVID-19 is that we can never guarantee a risk-free environment; however, we should all be aiming for as low a risk as possible. Guidance has changed repeatedly as we gather more information about COVID-19 and how it is spread, and as this changes, so should your risk assessments. Regular, date-stamped reviews are crucial to ensure you are as compliant as you possibly can be.

“It is also important to remember that the HSE does not need to prove the presence of COVID-19 in the workplace – the law requires consideration on risk of harm, rather than actual harm. Even if a business records no cases of infection, if it is not seen to implement measures to honour greater hygiene and social distancing, it may be in breach of the law and enforcement action could be taken against them.”

Ap-Thomas continues:

“Viruses have never been recognised as a legal risk – they are considered a hazard in the workplace, rather than a workplace hazard.

“Despite the fact that viruses have been largely excluded from workplace risk assessments in the past, the law – particularly the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 – is flexible enough to capture COVID-19 and the business community’s response to it. Therefore, all employers and duty holders should remember that they have a legal obligation to reduce risk, or they may face the consequences, both financially and reputationally.

“As we learn more about COVID-19, the expectation to do more will increase, and the sympathy for those who haven’t yet complied will decline. Look to other workplaces for examples of best practice, speak to your employees and their workplace representatives, and seek legal advice to ensure we can all successfully recover from the pandemic as quickly and as safely as possible.”

You may also be interested in

RELATED CONTENT

RELATED CONTENT

Risk Assessment and Method Statements (RAMS)
Risk Assessment and Method Statements (RAMS)

The Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) course examines the HSE’s recognised five-step approach to risk assessment.

Fire risk assessment
Fire risk assessment

The Fire risk assessment course is designed for individuals responsible for managing fire safety in a workplace or building.

Introduction to health and safety
Introduction to health and safety

Introduction to health and safety gives learners a basic introduction to managing safety in their workplace.

IOSH Managing Safely
IOSH Managing Safely

The world’s best-known health and safety certificate, designed for managers and supervisors in any sector or organisation.

Risk assessment: the ‘reasonably foreseeable’ test
Risk assessment: the ‘reasonably foreseeable’ test

Risk assessments are often the first thing to be reviewed in the event of an accident. Claire Deacon PhD, Health and Safety Trainer with International...

Robots in the workplace: an emerging risk to health and safety?
Robots in the workplace: an emerging risk to health and safety?

The use of machines in the workplace is nothing new. But, whereas robots were initially built to carry out simple tasks, nowadays artificial intellige...

Grenfell: Successive governments hid fire safety risks
Grenfell: Successive governments hid fire safety risks

Successive Governments concealed fire safety risks to buildings, resulting in one of the major scandals of our time, the Grenfell Tower fire inquiry h...

Government has failed to reduce physical risks at work over the last three years says TUC
Government has failed to reduce physical risks at work over the last three years says TUC

A new TUC survey of over 3,000 union health and safety representatives has revealed that no progress has been made in reducing physical risks for work...